It’s that time of the election cycle again. Candidates for national office are preaching their sweet-sounding message of “unity” to the American people. Each one believes him- or herself to be the man or woman for the job of healing our toxic politics and bringing us all together. Statements like this recent one from Sen. Amy Klobuchar are typical:

“Every single day where Donald Trump’s trying to divide our country, we should be one America.”

The question we need to be asking ourselves is: What are the values underlying the “one America” we’re being sold?

Surely no one suffers from the delusion that all Americans share the exact same set of values or prioritize them the same way. And that’s OK. Neither did the Founding Fathers. A Constitutional Republic like ours doesn’t require perfect consensus to function properly. In fact, our system thrives on healthy, civil debate over competing policy ideas.

It does; however, require that we respect certain principles that are fundamental to our system’s operation. Those principles are the ones that should form the center for our efforts to be unified.

That’s why I worry when the current slate of Democratic candidates for president talk about unifying the nation. In the typical stump speech, not far behind the expression of that noble desire is some version of a vow to address “income inequality” or some other perceived injustice.

The trouble is, the office they seek simply isn’t about that. According to the only legitimate source of federal power (our Constitution), the office of president is more about commanding our military and handling foreign affairs than about meddling with the practices of private business and industry.

In short, this idea that government should be in the business of guaranteeing citizens the good life is squarely at odds with America’s first principles — the ones that should be uniting us.

As we wade through another heated, divisive election season, here are a few of those principles that we should look for at the core of every candidate’s campaign.

Respect for the rule of law. We must always remember that the rule of law is what protects us from tyranny. The moment we give our tacit consent to policies that Washington has no legitimate power to make, we invite tyrants to rule us at their whims. And don’t assume that the candidates have some secret knowledge about the Constitution that you don’t have. If they talk about doing things the Constitution says nothing about, then they’re leading us down the wrong path.

Respect for individual liberty. Yes, this means we need to make sure candidates support our right to live out our faith and to speak our minds. But we need to look further. We should expect them to take a strong stand against our culture’s new orthodoxy that would label every non-adherent as a “hater.” (Think Drew Brees). A person who truly respects religious freedom does not approve of demonizing the beliefs of minorities.

Respect for our federal system. So few of our federal officials seem to understand that Washington, D.C. is not Super-Government. The states were always meant to do the bulk of domestic policy-making. They weren’t meant to be pawns of a bigger, “badder,” version of themselves. Any serious candidate needs to understand, and respect, how the role of federal government differs from the roles of the states.

So citizen, beware. Candidates who seek to heal our divided nation without regard to these principles are selling snake oil. They aren’t treating the real disease.

In speaking on divisions within the church, theologian J. Gresham Machen taught an important lesson. He pointed out that the evil consisted of the errors which caused the division, and not at all in the recognition of those errors.

The same can be said of policy ideas that defy our Constitution. Citizens should cry “foul” at the unlawful proposals. We should not be cowed by claims that we are causing “disunity” with fellow Americans who like the bogus ideas.

Yes, unity can be a beautiful thing. But we must always count the cost--and some values are too precious to surrender for the sake of it. A candidate may propose new policies that are pleasing to many Americans. But policies that “unite” a majority of citizens at the expense of our core constitutional principles will, in fact, only cause greater tears in our national fabric.

Rita Dunaway lives in Harrisonburg. Her column appears on

(3) comments


This is a very well written piece. First off, when good "unites" with evil, good always loses. There can be no unity; there can be no compromise. The ideas that these Demokkkratic politicians are promoting (stealing money from one group of citizens and using it to buy votes from another group of citizens, murdering babies in their mothers' wombs right up to, and even after the moment of birth, persecuting Christians for beliefs) are evil ideas, and need to be named as such. We don't need to unite behind these ideas. We need to defeat them.


Amen! Totally agree!


Thank you Dant.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.