When you don’t have the time or the wherewithal to do your own research, it’s important to identify a real expert and trust what he or she has to say on the matter.

This is an important principle in the state legislatures that are in session right now all over the country. Unlike members of Congress, most state legislators are truly “citizen legislators.” They have normal jobs and family duties.

So when they consider how to vote, it’s critical for them to hear from subject matter experts. The trouble is, in this time of “fake news,” there are also plenty of “fake experts.” When it comes to matters that affect the future of our country, these fake experts must be exposed and dismissed.

From radio star Mark Levin, to academic heavyweights like Independence Institute’s Rob Natelson, Princeton’s Robbie George and Georgetown’s Randy Barnett, virtually all of today’s great conservative thinkers agree: the states need to use their power to put the breaks on D.C. These guys, along with countless others (including Michael Farris, Thomas Sowell, and the late Sen. Thomas Coburn, just to name a few) support efforts to hold the first “convention for proposing amendments” under the Constitution’s Article V.

There is a large — and growing — grassroots movement to get two thirds of the states (34 of them) to apply for a convention. They seek amendments that do three things:

  • Impose fiscal restraints on D.C.
  • Limit the power and scope of the federal government
  • Set term limits for federal officials.

So far, 15 states have applied. At every committee hearing, citizens flock to the state capitol, often filling overflow rooms, to voice their support.

Rational citizens who want real solutions to federal overreach see Article V as the right tool. It has been used before to reverse bad Supreme Court cases. It can be used by the states to wipe away cases that have given the feds too much power.

The real experts — including those who have done scholarly research, written books, published peer-reviewed articles, and received formal training — agree that Article V is the right tool for the states to use, and that now is the time.

Enter a couple of self-proclaimed “constitutional experts.” They have no actual credentials. On behalf of the infamous “John Birch Society,” they go from state to state to inspire a paralyzing distrust in Article V among those with the power to use it for the nation’s benefit.

Take, for example, Robert Brown. The best anyone can tell, he is an insurance broker with neither legal expertise nor published research on the topic of Article V.

And yet, for reasons unknown, he holds himself out to state legislators as an expert on Article V. He slanders the Founding Fathers as dishonorable men who violated the public trust in 1787. He butchers historical texts by quoting them totally out of context. He seems to rely on the possibility that his ability to recite quotes from the Founders will dazzle committees into believing that his ultimate conclusion is right.

And what is that ultimate conclusion, you ask? It goes something like this: “The Founders made a big mistake in Article V. So whatever you do, don’t let the states hold a meeting and come up with proposals to rein in D.C. Meetings are scary and dangerous!”

The committee hearing room is very different from a court of law. There are no rules of evidence. There is no one to cross-examine the witnesses. There is no judge to decide whether a given witness actually qualifies as an “expert” or not. And this opens the door to potential mischief.

Retired law professor Rob Natelson put it this way:

“Suppose John Q. Quacker regularly influenced government health policy by holding himself out as a ‘nationally known cardiac surgeon’ — but had never gone to medical school, never served a residency, and never performed an operation. We would be justifiably concerned. We should be equally concerned when a person offers constitutional and other legal advice, and affects legislative policy, without any justifiable basis for doing so.”

One of the great things about our state legislatures is their accessibility to any and every citizen. Any and every citizen can share their thoughts and opinions about public policy. That is exactly as it should be. But we need our elected officials to remember that calling oneself an expert doesn’t make one such. We need them to discern the real experts from the quacks.

Rita Peters lives in Harrisonburg. Her column appears on thestream.org.

(11) comments


I see that Rita Dunaway is now Rita Peters. What happened? Did she get divorced? What does the Bible say about keeping your marriage vows and is she following Biblical teachings? I think an article by Ms. Peters explaining the name change is in order.


Yes, weld, I did get divorced. A year and a half ago, my ex-husband informed me that he had been having an adulterous affair with a co-worker for 3 years and that he was leaving me and my two children. It was quite painful. If you'd like to read more about the story of grace and redemption God is writing in my life, and in that of my husband and our 6 children, you can do so here: theknot.com/timandrita_psalm34-8. Thanks for your interest in making sure I am "following Biblical teachings!"

As far as writing a full article about this, I will definitely give it some thought.


Rita, excellent response. Blessings to you in your new marriage.


Excellent indeed.


Rita, for what it's worth, I enjoy your columns, and mostly agree with them (about 90% of the time). I hope that you continue to write them, as I believe they generate a lot of good discussion.


I'll second that.


rdunaway: Ouch. I'm glad the ordeal had a happy ending.


rdunaway, so nice of you to reply to such an idiotic comment by weld. His comment was made for one reason, to try and discredit you. I would bet weld is a liberal. Liberals will use any means they can, even someones personal life, to destroy them if they don't agree with their agenda.


fr: Sorry to disrupt your worldview, but I don't think weld is a liberal.


LVW, if weld isn't a liberal his/her comment must mean he/she has been watching too much CNN!


Her private life is her business but she is gracious enough to answer your inquiry.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.