Froma Harrop

There are moderates in the suburbs -- Democrats, Republicans and Independents -- who want Washington spending kept in check. They tend to be liberal on social issues but pained over the extremes of the woke. They have respect for various sexual identities but little interest in learning new pronouns. And they overwhelmingly want some access to abortion.

Except for the woke stuff, the Republican House leadership has ignored all of these preferences. Well-heeled suburbia tends to brush off its claims of fiscal propriety as bunk. Its voters are especially unhappy about how a confrontation over the debt ceiling would hurt their portfolios.

I grew up in New York's 3rd Congressional District, now represented by Republican George Santos. For many of its Democrats in Queens and northern Long Island, voting Republican required ignoring the crazies. The Jan. 6 rioters at the Capitol. The head case who broke into Nancy Pelosi's house and beat up her husband. The ex-con Solomon Pena, who, after losing his bid to win a seat in the New Mexico legislature, organized a team of hoodlums to shoot bullets into the homes of Democratic politicians.

Pena was nevertheless the Republicans' anointed candidate. As was George Santos.

The thing about Santos is that he looked normal. Only after the election did we learn that his official biography overflowed with lies -- that he's a deadbeat swimming in credible accusations of fraud, check-stealing and running assorted cons.

Fear of crime is what flipped four New York congressional districts in 2022, even though most of their comfy neighborhoods saw little of it. Many of these voters got sucked into the nonsense on right-wing media that was then amplified further on the left-wing media trying to counter it.

And so how might Santos voters react to the mockery that they now share as dupes? Not in a way that would be helpful to Republicans wanting to reconquer the suburbs.

Once the full picture emerged, Republicans on Long Island rightly demanded that Santos resign. That could have partly reflected a sense of betrayal and belief in rectitude. Much of it, though, was concern for the Republican brand in a part of the country that has shown willingness to send normal Republicans to Washington. You don't get more abnormal than George Santos.

It doesn't help that Republican House leaders continue to protect Santos. It's true that their narrow majority would become even narrower if he were to give up the seat, but the loss wouldn't have turned control back over to Democrats.

Savvy residents of New York's suburbs don't like lies and are usually informed enough to identify blatant non-truths. But they hate even more being taken for fools. Face it, Santos really pulled one over on them.

This electorate, furthermore, is heavily Jewish. To many of these voters, Santos' sins go beyond lying about having a Jewish grandmother who escaped in the Holocaust. (Turns out this grandmother was born and lived in Brazil and appears to not have been Jewish, in any case.)

That was bad, but other New York politicians have claimed Jewish heritage with scant evidence. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was one.

What must have truly rubbed Jewish voters wrong was Santos' using a fake Jewish name, Anthony Zabrovsky, to bilk an animal rescue charity. One of his roommates even quoted him as saying, "the Jews will give more if you're a Jew."

Conning Jewish voters with a vaguely antisemitic stereotype is not a good look in NY-3. Nor should it be elsewhere.

But Santos, it seems, cheated people of all races, ethnicities and religions -- and he's going to be top of the news through the 2024 election. That's not good for Republicans in the suburbs, above all, his.

(4) comments


Perhaps what we can take from Mr. Santos’ recent victory is that to be elected to Congress as a Republican in this New York Democratic district, one must posture as being gay, Latino, and Jewish, ticking a lot of the boxes on the hierarchy of victimhood pyramid and thus providing cover for virtue signaling folk who really just want criminal nogoodniks dealt with and kept out of their neighborhoods. But, one does have to give him credit -- borrowing from Yiddish or (in keeping with Mr. Santos’ unique perspective), “Yidd-ish”, he certainly has a lot of chutzpah! [scared]


Remember when Froaming at the Mouth wrote that article about how a sitting US House member on the Intelligence Committee was caught having sex with a Chinese spy, putting her on his payroll, giving her access to his office and campaign and who knows what else, and paying her with tens of thousands of US taxpayer dollars? Remember when she called for his removal? Yeah, me neither.

If you never called for Swalwell's removal from the House for allowing a Chinese spy to infiltrate his office and private parts, you can shut the flock up about Santos.


Froma is a hoot, she manages an entire piece on Santos but can't manage a paragraph on a sitting resident and his crackhead pedophile son being dupes of America's primary geopolitical adversary.

Lies of omission are the most insidious of all...


"The Talented Mr. Santos," coming soon to a theater near you.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.